BTP schedule help
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
BTP schedule help
Can someone help me set up a schedule???
I'm trying to set it up where I'm doing a protein rest and then bring my mash temp up to where I want it. The problem I'm having is keeping the collected volume where it's supposed to be.
After the protein rest, I'm sparging off the wort, then reheating it and then returning it to the mash tun. No matter what I put in, it keeps doubling my final volume as if I'm adding more water to the mash rather than just recycling it back into the system.
What am I doing wrong here?
I'm trying to set it up where I'm doing a protein rest and then bring my mash temp up to where I want it. The problem I'm having is keeping the collected volume where it's supposed to be.
After the protein rest, I'm sparging off the wort, then reheating it and then returning it to the mash tun. No matter what I put in, it keeps doubling my final volume as if I'm adding more water to the mash rather than just recycling it back into the system.
What am I doing wrong here?
-

Legman - Strong Ale

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:02 pm
- Location: North Carolina
RE: BTP schedule help
Legman,
I believe that after the protein rest step, you'll need to specify a TRANSFER step, which you can specify how much liquid is runoff to your kettle for boiling. The volume left in the tun should read something like 0.5 gallons or less depending on how much your system typically leaves behind. Then add another INFUSION step and fill out the temp and the volume of the returned wort to your tun and proceed with the rest of your schedule as planned. If you could possibly post your schedule it would be most helpful to give direction as to how to set it up. Ifyou can't post it here, I would be happy to take a look at it if you could send me the recipe file thru email. Let me know what you want to do.
(_)3
I believe that after the protein rest step, you'll need to specify a TRANSFER step, which you can specify how much liquid is runoff to your kettle for boiling. The volume left in the tun should read something like 0.5 gallons or less depending on how much your system typically leaves behind. Then add another INFUSION step and fill out the temp and the volume of the returned wort to your tun and proceed with the rest of your schedule as planned. If you could possibly post your schedule it would be most helpful to give direction as to how to set it up. Ifyou can't post it here, I would be happy to take a look at it if you could send me the recipe file thru email. Let me know what you want to do.
(_)3
Visit my blog @ http://www.wottashomebrewblog.blogspot.com
On Tap:
HL Pale Ale
HL Lite Lager
Bottled:
HL Simcoe Pale Ale
HL Wizeguy Weizenbock
HL Reveur Saison
HL Dry Stout
HL Kentucky Common
On Tap:
HL Pale Ale
HL Lite Lager
Bottled:
HL Simcoe Pale Ale
HL Wizeguy Weizenbock
HL Reveur Saison
HL Dry Stout
HL Kentucky Common
-

wottaguy - Moderator

- Posts: 361
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:00 am
- Location: Florida
Wouldn't you use the decotion step?
PowerMac G4 933 Mhz, 1GB Ram, 17" Studio Display, Mac OSX 10.3.9
MacBook 2.16 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IMac 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IPhone 5
IPad 2
I like macs
MacBook 2.16 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IMac 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IPhone 5
IPad 2
I like macs
-

jawbox - Strong Ale

- Posts: 487
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: W. Dundee
decoct
The problem I see is that a decoction is mostly grain that's heated, not liquid, so I wouldn't expect the temperatures calculated to be correct.
On a side note, if you heat all the wort high enough to raise the temperature of the grain bed for a saccharification rest, won't you kill the amylase enzymes?
On a side note, if you heat all the wort high enough to raise the temperature of the grain bed for a saccharification rest, won't you kill the amylase enzymes?
1.0 GHz G4 iBook, 12", 1256MB, OS 10.4.11, 1024x768 pixel resolution (2004 and still going strong.)
BTP v1.5.*
BTP v1.5.*
-

slothrob - Moderator

- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Greater Boston
RE: schedule help
A decoction step...hummmm i did wonder about that but in my mind you were not pulling out any grains...just liquid..and that's why I had thought of the transfer step followed by another infusion...I should have tried it out on a sample schedule, but I didn't have the time...but hey...i think i'll try out both and see what the differences are...ya learn something new every day..and if it suits your needs that's what counts.
Legman...did you at least try setting it up with the transfer step?? Just wondering what happened....
Thanks guy's!
(_)3
Legman...did you at least try setting it up with the transfer step?? Just wondering what happened....
Thanks guy's!
(_)3
Last edited by wottaguy on Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Visit my blog @ http://www.wottashomebrewblog.blogspot.com
On Tap:
HL Pale Ale
HL Lite Lager
Bottled:
HL Simcoe Pale Ale
HL Wizeguy Weizenbock
HL Reveur Saison
HL Dry Stout
HL Kentucky Common
On Tap:
HL Pale Ale
HL Lite Lager
Bottled:
HL Simcoe Pale Ale
HL Wizeguy Weizenbock
HL Reveur Saison
HL Dry Stout
HL Kentucky Common
-

wottaguy - Moderator

- Posts: 361
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:00 am
- Location: Florida
sloth, i think you are correct, pulling just liquid would run more risk or denaturing the enzymes.
Legman, won't your mash tun accommodate infusions? I just made a wit last weekend with a protein rest and then another infusion to get to saccharification temp.
Jaw
Legman, won't your mash tun accommodate infusions? I just made a wit last weekend with a protein rest and then another infusion to get to saccharification temp.
Jaw
PowerMac G4 933 Mhz, 1GB Ram, 17" Studio Display, Mac OSX 10.3.9
MacBook 2.16 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IMac 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IPhone 5
IPad 2
I like macs
MacBook 2.16 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IMac 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB Ram, Mac OSX 10.6.2
IPhone 5
IPad 2
I like macs
-

jawbox - Strong Ale

- Posts: 487
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:43 pm
- Location: W. Dundee
That may a good point about the decoction step.
I normally just do single infusion, so I really don't know what the heck I'm doing with these other mashing options. I don't see why I can't do infusions in my mash tun....it's 7 gallons.
I just tried to add a new infusion. The final volume did end up with what I wanted. I cut the mash in water by half and then added the other half after the protein rest to bring up the temp.
But for the mash in/protein rest, the water/grain ration is .76 qt/lb. Would this be an acceptable ratio or will that be to thick to mash in with?
I normally just do single infusion, so I really don't know what the heck I'm doing with these other mashing options. I don't see why I can't do infusions in my mash tun....it's 7 gallons.
I just tried to add a new infusion. The final volume did end up with what I wanted. I cut the mash in water by half and then added the other half after the protein rest to bring up the temp.
But for the mash in/protein rest, the water/grain ration is .76 qt/lb. Would this be an acceptable ratio or will that be to thick to mash in with?
-

Legman - Strong Ale

- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:02 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Legman wrote:But for the mash in/protein rest, the water/grain ration is .76 qt/lb. Would this be an acceptable ratio or will that be to thick to mash in with?
That's how I do it. Seems to work fine. Protein rest is pretty inefficient, so I think higher thickness is recommended, anyway.
1.0 GHz G4 iBook, 12", 1256MB, OS 10.4.11, 1024x768 pixel resolution (2004 and still going strong.)
BTP v1.5.*
BTP v1.5.*
-

slothrob - Moderator

- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Greater Boston
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to BeerTools Pro General Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
