Double Milling

Brewing processes and methods. How to brew using extract, partial or all-grain. Tips and tricks.

Moderator: slothrob

Double Milling

Postby brewmeisterintng » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:16 pm

I read a post on running your grain through the mill twice to get a better grist on another forum so in my last brew I gave it a try. I am using a Phils Mill single roller. I did add two handfuls of rice hulls to ward off a stuck mash and to my suprize I ended up 10 points over my expected OG calculated utilizing BeerTools. No stuck mash. I did add about a quart of water in the fermetor after the reading to thin it down abit. I am just wondering if anyone else has tried it. I told my buddy who also tried it and he is convinced that double milling is the way to go. Both of our brews are in the primarys so I can't tell you how it affected the finish but both are brews we have made before. Just food for thought. :roll:
User avatar
brewmeisterintng
Strong Ale
Strong Ale
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN

I'm hooked

Postby brewmeisterintng » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:37 pm

I now double mill all my grains separately the night before to ensure that I have a quality grist. It probably isn't a big deal for those who have double rollers but I think that without starting with a good grist you most likely won't get the OG you were expecting. Some will point to the mash tun and carburetor as the reason for a poor conversion/ efficiency but is all starts with properly cracked grains. I still throw in a couple of handfuls of rice hulls now on every batch because they are cheep and can only help.
User avatar
brewmeisterintng
Strong Ale
Strong Ale
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN

double milling

Postby slothrob » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:17 am

I've done double milling and got efficiencies in the 90%+ range. I used this to confirm that I'd benefit from a finer grind before adjusting my mill. I did get a minor stuck sparge that was relieved by a quick stir and vorlauf onj one batch.

I ultimately just adjusted my mill down until I was getting in the 80's.

When people are getting low efficiencies, I recommend double milling as a way to check to see if crush is their problem. It usually is.
1.0 GHz G4 iBook, 12", 1256MB, OS 10.4.11, 1024x768 pixel resolution (2004 and still going strong.)
BTP v1.5.*
User avatar
slothrob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Greater Boston

Isn't higher, better?

Postby brewmeisterintng » Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:03 pm

Or am I to assume that you get tannins and other assorted off flavors at higher converson rates?
Can you explain further?
User avatar
brewmeisterintng
Strong Ale
Strong Ale
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN

Better?

Postby slothrob » Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:59 pm

Some people believe that you get a maltier beer with lower efficiency, but that's not why I stuck with a single crush. Mostly I was worrried that I'd get tannins from shredded husks from the 2 passes, though the beers I made with double crushing showed no signs of this, and were quite malty.

I guess the other 2 factors were the stuck sparge, indicating that I may have been pushing the limit of my system, so should back off a little, and a desire not to have to put the grain through twice.

I think I can still close my gap slighly and increase my efficiency some more, but I'm quite happy with the 82% that I'm currently averaging so I haven't bothered with trying yet.
1.0 GHz G4 iBook, 12", 1256MB, OS 10.4.11, 1024x768 pixel resolution (2004 and still going strong.)
BTP v1.5.*
User avatar
slothrob
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Greater Boston


Return to Techniques, Methods, Tips & How To

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest